Choose your logical fallacy wisely

Logical Fallacies Poster


All these logical fallacies have been used in arguments by those who have touted mutation-driven evolution, a theory that was never substantiated by evidence from any experiment. All experimental evidence from every species shows that adaptive evolution is nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled (e.g., in my model).

Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) is central to my mammalian model of how conserved molecular mechanisms in species from microbes to man result in the fixation of new alleles required for adaptive evolution. Yesterday (9/20/13) an article was published that proved mammalian GnRH secretion integrates everything involved in the adaptive evolution of the human brain and behavior.

One week earlier (9/13/13),  a refutation of mutation-driven evolution was published. In the refutation, the only experiments ever performed showed that mutations are not fixed in the organized genome of C. elegans. New alleles that result from mutations cannot cause anything because they are not fixed in the genome. C. elegans (i.e., a nematode) is one several model organisms that exemplify nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution via fixation of new alleles in my model.

Please choose the logical fallacy you wish to commit, if you intend to argue against my model, which details how new alleles are fixed, or would like to argue for a ridiculous theory with no evidence of fixed alleles in the context of natural selection. Your argument can then be evaluated based on the logical fallacy you would rather use as you continue to ignore these unequivocal biological facts: 1) nutrients must be selected for adaptive evolution to occur, and 2) nutrients metabolize to species-specific pheromones that control reproduction, and thereby control any adaptive evolution that occurs.

About James V. Kohl 1307 Articles
James Vaughn Kohl was the first to accurately conceptualize human pheromones, and began presenting his findings to the scientific community in 1992. He continues to present to, and publish for, diverse scientific and lay audiences, while constantly monitoring the scientific presses for new information that is relevant to the development of his initial and ongoing conceptualization of human pheromones. Recently, Kohl integrated scientific evidence that pinpoints the evolved neurophysiological mechanism that links olfactory/pheromonal input to genes in hormone-secreting cells of tissue in a specific area of the brain that is primarily involved in the sensory integration of olfactory and visual input, and in the development of human sexual preferences. His award-winning 2007 article/book chapter on multisensory integration: The Mind’s Eyes: Human pheromones, neuroscience, and male sexual preferences followed an award winning 2001 publication: Human pheromones: integrating neuroendocrinology and ethology, which was coauthored by disinguished researchers from Vienna. Rarely do researchers win awards in multiple disciplines, but Kohl’s 2001 award was for neuroscience, and his 2007 “Reiss Theory” award was for social science. Kohl has worked as a medical laboratory scientist since 1974, and he has devoted more than twenty-five years to researching the relationship between the sense of smell and the development of human sexual preferences. Unlike many researchers who work with non-human subjects, medical laboratory scientists use the latest technology from many scientific disciplines to perform a variety of specialized diagnostic medical testing on people. James V. Kohl is certified with: * American Society for Clinical Pathology * American Medical Technologists James V. Kohl is a member of: * Society for Neuroscience * Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology * Association for Chemoreception Sciences * Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality * International Society for Human Ethology * American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science * Mensa, the international high IQ society